Don't have an account?
Structured reporting in radiology continues to gain traction, albeit more slowly than in other specialties.
Structured reporting uses IT, including artificial intelligence (AI), to automatically populate and arrange data into a template to create consistent, organized, and easily accessible radiology reports.1,2
Healthcare organizations are increasingly embracing structured reporting, and for good reason. It can improve the accuracy, consistency, clarity, and reproducibility of radiological operations. This can reduce diagnostic errors and inadvertent omissions, improve patient outcomes, minimize delays, support value-based models, and facilitate data mining.3,4,5,6,7
By minimizing subjectivity and ambiguity, structured reporting increases the accuracy and readability of reports. This opens the door to better communication within and across healthcare teams because they are all speaking a common language. Structured reporting can help ensure the imaging information needed to inform care decisions is available. This can be especially valuable when cross-disciplinary teams like tumor boards are involved.8
Because structured reporting can enhance interoperability across health systems and their electronic health records (EHRs), picture archiving and communication systems (PACs), and more, it could potentially enable comprehensive longitudinal care across the continuum of care.9
Increased report clarity also benefits the referring physician. Too often, physicians must go back to the radiologist for help deciphering the report, creating delays in diagnosis and treatment. Or they may order another round of imaging, which drives up costs, leads to longer delays, and adds to the patient and clinician burden.
By improving the clarity of reports, standardized reporting supports clinical efficiency.
At RSNA 2022, Jason B. Wiesner, MD, MBA, executive director of imaging informatics at Sutter Health, talked about the practical impact of structured reporting. After implementing a structured reporting workflow, his team conducted a time and motion study. Among the findings:10
Greater efficiency means the radiologist can focus on the types of interpretation and diagnostic decision-making only humans can do.
It can also increase reimbursements, with fewer billing opportunities lost due to incomplete documentation.7 Wiesner noted charge capture increased because the system was capturing work that had already been done. It can improve reimbursements in another important way. Data extracted from structured reports can help organizations maximize reimbursements under value-based models. 4
AI provides a powerful tool for extracting that data.
With the ability to identify patterns and detect abnormalities not visible to the human eye, AI can dramatically accelerate data mining, especially in clinical or research settings.3 Clinicians can mine the data for population health trends, healthcare organizations can find business insights, and clinical researchers can access data that will lead to more precise diagnostics and therapeutics.7
AI can analyze images to localize and classify abnormalities, quantify findings, and provide measurements and annotations that populate the radiology report. This leads to comprehensive results that can enhance decision-making and establish better patient care.11 Moreover, AI—specifically natural language processing—can support the better integration of speech into structured reporting.12
Think of AI in radiology reporting as a symbiotic relationship: AI supports structured reporting and structured reporting supports AI. Data from structured reports can "teach" AI's deep learning algorithms, accelerating their development. This, in turn, can improve the accuracy and sensitivity of image analysis tools. 7,11
Despite its clear advantages, the adoption of structured reporting varies across departments, specialties, and settings.
Early adopters include leading academic medical centers and large healthcare systems. Specialties involving clinical procedures, including neurology, oncology, maternal-fetal medicine, and cardiology also tend to have higher adoption.7 In contrast, many radiologists remain reluctant. Some consider structured reporting as a threat to their individuality.3 "They have their tried-and-true methods," explains Robert Dalquest, field connectivity leader, radiology & ultrasound IT at GE HealthCare.
Winning the hearts and minds of radiologists is only one of the considerations. Several other factors contribute to the comparatively slow uptake of standardized reporting in radiology.
Healthcare organizations planning to implement structured reporting need to work with a technology partner who can help seamlessly integrate structured reporting and bring the radiologists up to speed. The right partner with the right technology will be able to address concerns about interoperability, automation, and workflow burden.
Healthcare organizations will need to step up to this challenge. By some accounts, mainstream adoption of structured reporting in radiology will occur within the next five years.7 Now is the time for healthcare organizations, radiology teams, and health IT departments to prepare. "It's not a matter of if. It's a matter of when," Dalquest says.
REFERENCES:
GE is a trademark of General Electric Company used under trademark license.