A 55 year old man presented with sudden onset right sided weakness and aphasia. Computed tomography angiogram showed a left internal carotid artery occlusion and thrombus in the proximal left middle cerebral artery. The patient was treated with intravenous thrombolysis. His weakness resolved, and he was left with expressive dysphasia only.
Two days into admission, the patient recalled an injury to the left side of the neck from a squash ball, two weeks before presentation (fig 1). Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography confirmed arterial dissection (fig 2) as the primary pathology, presumed secondary to neck trauma.
Carotid artery dissection accounts for 10%-25% of ischaemic strokes in young patients,1 of mean age 44 years.2 Approximately 40% of these dissections are associated with trauma.3 Embolic events to the brain can occur weeks after the dissection. Eliciting a history of trauma enables selection of the most appropriate imaging modality and treatment for the stroke aetiology.
- WI Schievink. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med2001;344:898-906. 10.1056/NEJM200103223441206 11259724
- E TouzéJY GauvritT MoulinJF MederS BracardJL MasMulticenter Survey on Natural History of Cervical Artery Dissection. Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection: a multicenter study. Neurology2003;61:1347-51. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000094325.95097.86 14638953
- ST EngelterC Grond-GinsbachTM MetsoCervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients Study Group. Cervical artery dissection: trauma and other potential mechanical trigger events. Neurology2013;80:1950-7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318293e2eb 23635964
MEDICAL DISCLAIMER NOTICE: To the fullest extent permitted by law, the material and information displayed in The BMJ is provided "as is" without any guarantees, conditions or warranties as to accuracy. We rely on our authors of articles, contractors and third party data providers to confirm the accuracy of information and advertisements presented and to describe generally accepted practices and therefore we as the publisher and editors cannot warrant its accuracy. Differences may occur also between the print and online text of articles and advertisements. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this fact and also because of regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers independently verify any information that they chose to rely upon. Ultimately it is the reader's responsibility to make their own professional judgements. Opinions posted on Rapid Responses, the Advice Zone, International Experience and any other parts of the sites are those of the individuals posting them and not the views of BMJ.