In SPGR, the
transverse magnetization is prevented from forming echoes by
using an RF spoiling technique. This is accomplished by
linearly incrementing the phase of the RF pulses from one TR
interval to the next. Both the RF excitation and readout phase
must be incremented. This can be thought of as exciting along
the x-axis and reading along x at the first iteration, then
rotating the exciter/reader by some angle (phase) so that the
previous excitation magnetization is effectively phase-offset
from the current signal, and so should contribute minimally.
Because SPGR is designed specifically to disrupt the T2
coherence pathways, it is most useful for creating T1-wtd and
PD-wtd images.
Use of a short TE decreases the amount
of T2*-weighting in this sequence. For short TE, the
combination of TR and flip angle together determines the image
contrast. With all other parameters equal, low flip angles are
used to create more PD-weighting in the image, and higher flip
angles yield increased T1-weighting. The flip angle yielding
the maximum signal intensity that can be obtained using the
SPGR sequence is given by the Ernst angle, which can be
calculated from:
cos
=exp(-TR/T1)
(1.5)
where
is the flip angle.
This flip
angle also defines the critical flip angle below which the
images are predominantly PD-weighted (the farther away from
the Ernst angle, the higher the PD-weighting), and above which
the images are T1-wtd.
There are useful rules-of-thumb
approximations that can be applied to determine what flip
angle to choose for a certain type of contrast. These
rules-of-thumb stem from a short TR assumption (TR <<
T1). In this limit, the quantity (exp(-TR/T1)) can be
approximated with (1-TR/T1), from which the Ernst angle,
E can be approximated as:

Using the
above approximation, the Ernst angle in degrees can be quickly
calculated for each tissue based on its TR-to-T1 ratio. For PD
weighting, the rule-of-thumb is to choose a flip angle that is
lower than the lowest Ernst angle, whereas, the rule-of-thumb
is choose a flip angle larger than the largest Ernst angle for
T1 weighting.
|
|
SPGR techniques are often
used in the evaluation of articular cartilage, but are
not useful in the post-operative setting due to the
signal losses and distortions associated with metal on
GRE sequences. These techniques are sometimes used as
input for 3D rendering algorithms (Fig. 1.26), but these
require long acquisition times. |
(click on image for enlarged view) Figure
1.26 Thin-slice SPGR image of a knee reconstructed
from a 3D data
set. |