Introduction
|
Lets see an example of one European country: UK. Stroke is the leading cause of death in UK after cancers and heart disease; 150,000 strokes and 20,000 transient ischaemic attacks (TIA or “mini strokes”) occur in the UK every year1 costing the NHS over £2.8billion2. 85% of strokes are caused by a blockage of the blood flowing to the brain; these are ischaemic strokes. The remainder are haemorrhagic strokes, in which a blood vessel in the brain bursts. In both types of stroke, brain damage can occur because the oxygen supply to part of the brain is restricted. The new UK stroke strategy, launched on 5 December 20073, urges to develop stroke services, which can image and treat high-risk patients with TIA within 24 hours. Prompt diagnosis and treatment could potentially reverse the effects of stroke, thus reducing mortality and morbidity rates. The use of un-enhanced Computerised Tomography (CT) can confirm infarction and haemorrhage, which is a contra-indication to thrombolytic treatment. However, MR is shown to be 3 times more sensitive than CT during the initial 6-hour window4. Because it is ubiquitous, accessible and fast, CT has been the mainstay of stroke imaging. However, there is a group of patients for which the CT scan is normal, and whose management may be changed by a prompt MR examination, when it is not contra-indicated. Few departments would be able to offer this access today, even for co-operative patients, because the usual scanning time of around 15 minutes added to patient preparation would cause considerable disruption to the MR schedule. References: |















